Available online on 15.06.2023 at ijmspr.com

 International Journal of Medical Sciences and Pharma Research 

Open Access to Medical Science and Pharma Research

Copyright  © 2023 The   Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited


                       Open Access                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Research Article                                                         

  


Utilisation of Oral Health Services and Associated Factors in a Sub-Urban Population in Western Uganda

Chikuni Wellington 2 , Amalimeh Benedict Erhite 3 , Agholor Collins Nimbiye 1* 

1 Department of Restorative Dentistry, Delta State University Teaching Hospital, Oghara, Delta State, Nigeria

2 Faculty of Clinical Medicine and Dentistry, Kampala International University, Western Campus, Ishaka, Uganda

3 Department of Oral and maxillofacial surgery, College of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda

Article Info:

_____________________________________________

Article History:

Received 21 Feb 2023  

Reviewed 28 March 2023

Accepted 09 April 2023

Published 15 June 2023

_____________________________________________

Cite this article as: 

Chikuni W, Amalimeh BE, Agholor CN, Utilisation of Oral Health Services and Associated Factors in a Sub-Urban Population in Western UgandaInternational Journal of Medical Sciences & Pharma Research, 2023; 9(2):1-12

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/ijmspr.v9i2.71               ____________________________________________*Address for Correspondence:  

Agholor Collins Nimbiye (BDS, FWACS), Department of Restorative Dentistry, Delta State University Teaching Hospital, Oghara, Delta State, Nigeria

Abstract

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Aim: To determine the prevalence and factors affecting the level of utilization of oral health services in a sub urban adult population in Ishaka-Western Uganda. 

Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 384 study participants. Data was collected using pre-tested and structured questionnaires. Data was entered in Epi-info computer software version 3.5.1 and exported to STATA Version 14.0 for analysis. Univariate analysis and modified Poisson regression were done to identify factors associated with utilization of oral health services. Crude prevalence ratios with 95% confidence interval were used to determine the level of significance at bivariate meanwhile adjusted prevalence ratios were calculated at multivariate analysis to establish independent significant factors. 

Results: The mean age of the study participants was 30.22 ± 9.97. It was observed that 36.72% of the study participants had utilized oral health services. Factors affecting utilization of oral health services that were statistically significant were level of education (tertiary level of education versus none) (P<0.001), average monthly income of >1,000,0000 Shilings (about $300) versus <501,000 ( about $150) (P<0.001), no phobia for dental procedures (P=0.035), perception that oral health visits are important (P=0.017) and positive attitude of  attending health workers ( P=0.028). 

Conclusion: This study has shown that the level of utilization of oral health services in the studied suburban adult population was poor. The level of education, income and phobia for dental procedures were associated with the utilization of oral health services. It is recommended that oral health promotion strategies be deployed in order to increase awareness and access to oral health care.

Keywords: Oral health services, community-based cross-sectional study, Uganda

 


 

INTRODUCTION

According to the WHO1, oral health means more than just good dentition: It is a state of being free from chronic mouth and facial pain, oral and throat cancer, oral sores, birth defects such as cleft lip and palate, periodontal (gum) disease, tooth decay and tooth loss, and other diseases and disorders that affect the oral cavity1. Utilization of dental services can be unambiguously defined as the proportion of a defined population with one or more dental visits in a given time period, usually a calendar year 2

Oral health is one of the most neglected areas of global health, yet 90% of people worldwide have had some form of oral health condition such as caries and periodontitis 3. Globally, the average coverage of oral and dental care is 58.4% and 48.5% in developed countries 3. This may be attributed to dental services being expensive, with oral diseases being the fourth most expensive diseases to manage 4. The direct financial burden of dental services in the world is estimated at $298billion per year 5 with the Global Burden of Disease being estimated that oral diseases affect 3.5 billion people worldwide 1

The utilization of dental services is varied across countries. In developing countries, the majority of people only visit the dentist for pain relief rather than preventive care 6, while in developed countries about 40–80% of the adults visit a dentist in a given year 7. Studies from developed countries assessing the level and the pattern of utilization of dental health services have shown fair to good utilization patterns 8-10. Nonetheless, financial barriers to obtaining needed care were comparatively higher for dental care relative to other healthcare services 5.

Studies from the African continent highlight poor utilization of dental care across urban and rural populations because of economic difficulties, dwindling health funding, poor perceived oral needs, competing demand, misconceptions about oral health, inadequate facilities, and shortage of dental workforce 11-13

Dental service utilization is driven by a complex interaction of individual, social and contextual factors which influence access to dental care. In many Sub Saharan African countries, the availability and accessibility of oral health services is seriously constrained and the provision of essential oral care is limited 12, 14, 15.

In previous studies conducted in some parts of Nigeria, the utilization of dental services was reported low and varied between 15.5% and 56.5% 16. In East Africa, Oral Health services are offered by the public and private sectors, which comprise of hospitals, health centres, dispensaries, nursing and maternity homes, and health clinics 4. In Kenya, over the years, the demand for oral health has outstripped the financial provision from the exchequer. The ratio of dentists to the population is approximately 1:60,000 when both the public and private sector are combined 17.

In Uganda, the government has had to deal with several pressing health issues, most recently, COVID-19 pandemic. This has led to giving limited priority to seemingly less life-threatening conditions such as oral health 18. For instance, less than 0.1% of the Gross Domestic Product is allocated for the direct oral health care and the dentist to population ratio is 1:158,000 people which are way higher than the ratio recommended by WHO 18. With this insufficiency, resources are primarily allocated to emergency oral care and pain relief. Subsequently, majority (90%) of the dental caries remain untreated in low income countries 19, 20

There is insufficient data on the oral health situation in Uganda as well as the utilization of oral health services 18. However, the available data shows that there has been low utilization of oral health services over the years 14. In the western region, there is paucity literature about the utilization of dental services and associated factors that policy makers can rely on to formulate policies about oral and dental service provision. It is on that background that this study is set to determine the utilization of oral health services a sub urban population in western Uganda. 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was a community-based cross-sectional study. Data collection for this study took place between July and November 2021 after the approval was granted from the Ethics and Research Committee of the Faculty of Clinical Medicine and Dentistry, Kampala International University Western Campus, Ishaka in a protocol number KIU/ERC/A/VOL.II/1254. Also, permission was sought from the Town Clerk of Ishaka Municipality. A total of 384 randomly selected adults were recruited to participate in the study.

The three divisions in Ishaka Municipality, Bushenyi District constituted the sample frame. The names of these divisions were written on pieces of paper, folded, put in a container and closed. The contents of the container were shaken several times to ensure a good mix or randomization of the pieces of paper. The divisions were selected making sure that half of the available wards were sampled. Households were mapped and numbered according to the mapping strategy. Systematic sampling technique was used where a house was selected (from a random start) and the rest of houses were selected at the sampling interval. Systemic sampling technique was used to ensure that each house had equal probability of being selected with 4 houses interval in each direction. Purposive sampling techniques were adopted in selecting eligible respondents; this was on the premise of having an adult who was willing to participate. For each of the households approached, it was first determined which household members were eligible for participation. If only one person met the eligibility criteria, that individual was asked to participate in the study. If more than one person from the household met the eligibility criteria, then one of them was randomly selected and asked to participate in the study. 

The researchers used questionnaires as the main data collection tool. The questionnaires (Appendix II) were administered in participant's preferred language (Lunyankole or English) after formalities were carried out and informed consent obtained. Special arrangement was made for those who were not able to read and write. Such participants had the information given to them orally in their preferred language of communication and assisted in filling the questionnaire.

A self-administered structured close-ended questionnaire constructed in line with the objectives of the study was used in this study. The questionnaire was divided into 3 sections as follows: Section A, which addressed individual characteristics; Section B: utilization of oral health services; and Section C, probable factors affecting utilization of oral health services (exposure variables). 

Calibration of researchers, assistants as well as instruments for data collection was done prior to the study. Field testing of the data collection tools was done as part of the overall process of preparation for data collection in one of the villages. The principal researcher was assisted by group members in providing guidance for the data collectors. There were four teams of data collectors and in each team there was a team leader who assisted the principal researcher monitoring and supervising ongoing data collection. Also, all completed forms from the field were reviewed daily and on-the-spot feedback was provided with follow-up/callback undertaken, where needed.   

In this study, the questionnaire was pre-tested for its content and validity among 30 respondents in Sheema Municipality. The responses from the pilot study were used to improve the clarity, reliability and relevance of the questionnaire. 

Content Validity Index was calculated basing on judgment by at least two knowledgeable people (Judges). A score of 0.78 was gotten and the instrument was deemed valid for use. Data obtained from a pre-determined questionnaire was used to determine the Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. An index of 0.89 was gotten which indicated that the items of the questionnaire were reproducible and consistent.

Collected data was verified to ensure completeness, coded, entered in an Excel (Microsoft Corporation) spread sheet, cleaned and edited for inconsistence before they were exported into STATA software for analysis. The outcome variable was “Utilized” or “Not Utilized” for oral health services and was assigned one (1) when a respondent reported to have ever used oral health services and zero (0) when otherwise. The individual characteristic was calculated in frequencies and percentage and the information was summarized in the form of graphs, pie charts, narrations and tables to give descriptive statistics. Frequencies, percentages of the respondent’s characteristics were produced. At a descriptive level, these variables were compared between the entire study samples. This was done using Pearson’s chi-square statistic. Statistical significance was considered to be p-value < 0.05. 

The factors associated with the utilization of oral health services were assessed using logistic regression. Both bivariate and multivariate Poisson regression analysis was carried out. The variables which were found to be having P value less than 0.02 at bivariate Poisson regression were entered into a multivariate model. The final multivariate model was significant when 

p< 0.05. The measure of association was reported as Prevalence ratios (PRs) with corresponding 95% CI and p-value. All statistical analyses were carried out in STATA version.


 

 

RESULTS

Table 1: Frequency table for socio-demographic characteristics of Study Participants. .

Variable

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

Marital Status

 

 

Not Married

58

15.10

Married

258

67.19

Cohabiting

22

05.73

Divorced 

46

11.98

Family Headed by Single Parent

 

 

Yes

108

28.13

No

276

71 .88

Head of family Headed by Single parent

Man

70

64.81

Woman 

38

35.19

Education Level 

 

 

None

118

30.73

Primary

49

12.76

Secondary

91

23.70

Tertiary 

126

32.81

Employment Status 

 

 

Employed

175

45.57

Unemployed

82

21.35

Business

53

13.80

Student 

74

19.27

Average Monthly Income (UGX)

 

 

<501,000

207

53.91

501,000-1,000,000

73

19.01

>1,000,0000 

104

27.08

Has Health Insurance 

 

 

Yes

130

33.85

No

254 

66.15

Willingness to seek dental health services if health insurance is available

Yes

154

60.63

No

71

27.95

Maybe

29

11.42

Limited Time to seek dental services

 

 

Yes

176

45.83

No

208

54.17

Transport Problems 

 

 

Yes

167

43.49

No

217

56.51

Taboos which prohibit seeking oral health services 

Yes

40

10.42

No

151

39.32

Don’t Know

193

50.26

Religion

 

 

Catholic

167

43.49

Anglican

119

30.99

Muslim

67

17.45

SDA

18

04.69

Others

13

03.39

 


 

The majority of participants (67.19%) were married, had varying levels of formal education (69.3%) and employed (45.57%receiving an average monthly income of less than 501,000 Ugandan shillings. Also, most of the study participants (66.15%) did not have health insurance but were willing to seek dental health services if they did.

Additionally, most respondents did not have any cultural taboos militating against seeking dental treatment.


 

 

 

Table 2; Frequency table for Individual Characteristics of Study Participants. 

Variable

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

Age in years

 

 

18 – 30  

267

69.53

31 – 40  

82

21.35

41 – 50  

12

03.13

51 – 60 

09

02.34

 61

14

03.65

Tribe of Study Participants 

 

 

Munyankole

243

63.28

Munyaruguru

32

08.33

Mukonjo

38

09.90

Baganda

40

10.42

Others

31

08.07

Gender

 

 

Male

147

38.28

Female

237

61.72

Pregnancy status of females

 

 

Pregnant

60

26.20

Not Pregnant 

169

73.80

In charge of making decisions to seek health services 

Yes

213

55.47

No

171

44.53

Dental Visits are important  

 

 

Yes

286

74.48

No

98

25.52

Anxiety from thought of dental visit

 

 

Yes

195

50.78

No

189

49.22

Phobia for dental procedures

 

 

Yes  

127

33.07

No  

257

66.93

Fear of infection  from dental procedures

Yes

188

48.96

No

196

51.04

Has a chronic systemic disease

 

 

Yes

74

19.27

No

310

80.73

 


 

Majority of the study participants (69.53%) were aged 18–30 years and were female (61.72%). Most respondents (74.48%) acknowledged that dental visits are important and about half of them (50.73%) had anxiety regarding visits to a dental health practitioner and fears of contracting some form of infection following a dental appointment (51.04%)


 

 

 

 

 

Table 3 Frequency Table for Health Services Related Characteristics

Variable

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

Oral health Services are expensive 

 

 

Yes

147

38.28

No

237

61.72

Previous experience of poor oral service

Yes

125

32.55

No

259

67.45

The Procedure was done from a dental clinic

Yes

97

67.83

No

46

32.17

Availability of a dentist nearby 

 

 

Yes

257

66.93

No

127

33.07

Would seek dental treatment if dental clinic was close in the area

Yes 

77

50.66

No

53

34.87

Maybe

22

14.47

Oral health services offered in government facilities 

Yes

271

70.57

No

113

29.43

Perception of health worker’s attitude 

 

 

Negative

106

27.60

Positive

213

55.47

Don’t Know

65

16.93

Received instruction on care of the teeth

Yes

166

43.23

No

218

56.77

Long Waiting time  

 

 

Yes

165

42.97

No

219

57.03

 


 

It was observed that the majority of study participants(61.72%) felt that oral health services are expensive while about a third of the study participants reported a previous bad oral care treatment experience or know someone whose dental condition was managed poorly by the DHCP.  Furthermore, 55.47% of respondents indicated that health workers have positive attitude towards clients with 56.77% of the study participants recieving instructions on oral hygiene and care


 

 

 


 

Figure 1: Pie Chart Showing Overall level of Utilization of Oral Health Services

image

The overall level of utilization of oral services among adult population in Ishaka – Western Uganda is shown in Figure 1. It was observed that results of the study revealed that 37% of participants studied utilized oral health services within the last 5 years. 

Figure 2: Bar graph showing frequency of Utilization of Oral Health

image

The frequency of utilization of oral health services among the study participants are shown in Figure 2. The majority of the study participants 41.13% utilized oral health services on a yearly basis, while 35.46% utilized oral health services whenever they had problems.


 

 Table 4: Socio-Demographic Factors Associated With Utilization of Oral Health Services

Variables

Utilization 

cPR (95% CI)

P Value

No

Count, (%)

Yes

Count, (%)

Marital Status

Single

35 (60.34)

23 (39.66)

1.00

 

Married

159 (61.63)

99 (38.37)

0.97 (0.68-1.38)

0.855

Cohabiting

16 (72.73)

06 (27.27)

0.69 (0.32-1.46)

0.330

Divorced 

33 (71.74)

13 (28.26)

0.71 (0.41-1.25)

0.236

Family Headed by Single Parent

Yes

76 (70.37)

32 (29.63)

1.00

 

No

167 (60.51)

109 (39.49)

1.15 (0.74-1.81)

0.531

Head of family Headed by Single parent

Man

46 (65.71)

24 (34.29)

1.00

 

Woman 

30 (78.95)

08 (21.05)

0.89 (0.55-1.44)

0.638

Education Level 

 

 

 

 

None

88 (74.58)

30 (25.42)

1.00

 

Primary

33 (67.35)

16 (32.65)

1.28 (0.77-2.13)

0.334

Secondary

69 (75.82)

22 (24.18)

0.95 (0.59-1.53)

0.837

Tertiary 

53 (42.06)

73 (57.94)

2.28 (1.62-3.21)

<0.001

Employment Status 

 

 

 

 

Employed

111 (63.43)

64 (36.57)

1.00

 

Unemployed

51 (62.20)

31 (37.80)

1.03 (0.74-1.45)

0.848

Business

32 (60.38)

21 (39.62)

1.08 (0.74-1.59)

0.684

Student 

49 (66.22)

25 (33.78)

0.92 (0.64-1.34)

0.678

Average Monthly Income 

<501,000

153 (73.91)

54 (26.09)

1.00

 

501,000-1,000,000

45 (61.64)

28 (38.36)

1.47 (1.01-2.13)

0.042

>1,000,0000 

45 (43.27)

59 (56.73)

2.17 (1.64-2.89)

<0.001

Has Health Insurance 

 

 

 

 

Yes

90 (69.23)

40 (30.77)

1.00

 

No

153 (60.24)

101 (39.76)

1.29 (0.96-1.74)

0.093

Willingness to seek dental health services if health insurance is available

Yes

89 (57.79)

65 (42.21)

1.00

 

No

47 (66.20)

24 (33.80)

0.80 (0.55-1.17)

0.246

Maybe

17 (58.62)

12 (41.38)

0.98 (0.61-1.57)

0.934

Limited Time to seek dental services

Yes

110 (62.50)

66 (37.50)

1.00

 

No

133 (63.94)

75 (36.06)

0.96 (0.74-1.25)

0.770

Transport Problems 

 

 

 

 

Yes

107 (64.07)

60 (35.93)

1.00

 

No

136 (62.67)

81 (37.33)

1.04 (0.80-1.36)

0.779

Taboos which prohibit seeking oral health services 

Yes

20 (50.00)

20 (50.00)

1.00

 

No

95 (62.91)

56 (37.09)

0.74 (0.51-1.08)

0.117

Don’t Know

128 (66.32)

65 (33.68)

0.67 (0.47-0.97)

0.035

Religion

 

 

 

 

Catholic

91 (63.64)

52 (36.36)

1.00

 

Anglican

88 (61.54)

55 (38.46)

1.06 (0.78-1.43)

0.714

Muslim

46 (68.66)

21 (31.34)

0.86 (0.57-1.31)

0.484

SDA

08 (44.44)

10 (55.56)

1.53 (0.96-2.44)

0.075

Others

10 (76.92)

03 (23.08)

0.63 (0.23-1.75)

0.381

CI = Confidence Interval, cPR = Crude Prevalence Ratio, P Value is Significant at 0.05 level

 


 

Results of the analysis showed that Education level and monthly income were the socio-demographic factors significantly associated with utilization of oral health services. Participants who had attained tertiary level of education were more likely to utilize oral health services than their counterparts who had no education (P<0.001). Study participants who had an average monthly income of 501,000-1,000,000 Shillings and above were also more likely to utilize oral health services than study participants who had an average monthly income of less than 501,000 Shillings(P=0.042)


 

 

Table 5: Individual Factors Associated With Utilization of Oral Health Services

Variables

Utilization 

cPR (95% CI)

P Value

No

Count (%)

Yes

Count (%)

Age in years

18 – 30  

167 (62.55)

100 (37.45)

1.00

 

31 – 40  

51 (62.20)

31 (37.80)

1.01 (0.73-1.39)

0.954

41 – 50  

10 (83.33)

02 (16.67)

0.45 (0.12-1.59)

0.214

51 – 60 

04 (44.44)

05 (55.56)

1.48 (0.81-2.72)

0.202

 61

11 (78.57)

03 (21.43)

0.57 (0.21-1.58)

0.282

Tribe of Study Participants 

Munyankole

150 (61.73)

93 (38.27)

1.00

 

Munyaruguru

20 (62.50)

12 (37.50)

0.98 (0.61-1.58)

0.933

Mukonjo

26 (68.42)

12 (31.58)

0.83 (0.50-1.35)

0.477

Baganda

28 (70.00)

12 (30.00)

0.78 (0.48-1.29)

0.340

Others

19 (61.29)

12 (38.71)

1.01 (0.63-1.62)

0.962

Gender

Male

88 (59.86)

59 (40.14)

1.00

 

Female

155 (65.40)

82 (34.60)

0.86 (0.66-1.12)

0.271

Pregnancy status of females

Pregnant

42 (70.00)

18 (30.00)

1.00

 

Not Pregnant 

107 (63.31)

62 (36.69)

1.22 (0.79-1.89)

0.365

In charge of making decisions to seek health services 

Yes

136 (63.85)

77 (36.15)

1.00

 

No

107 (62.57)

64 (37.43)

1.04 (0.80-1.35)

0.797

Dental Visits are important  

Yes

171 (59.79)

115 (40.21)

1.00

 

No

72 (73.47)

26 (26.53)

0.66 (0.46-0.94)

0.023

Anxiety from thought of dental visit

Yes

128 (65.64)

67 (34.36)

1.00

 

No

115 (60.85)

74 (39.15)

1.14 (0.88-1.48)

0.331

Phobia for dental procedures

Yes  

90 (70.87)

37 (29.13)

1.00

 

No  

153 (59.53)

104 (40.47)

1.39 (1.02-1.89)

0.037

Fear of infection  from dental procedures

Yes

125 (66.49)

63 (33.51)

1.00

 

No

118 (60.20)

78 (39.80)

1.19 (0.91-1.55)

0.204

Has a chronic systemic disease

Yes

50 (67.57)

24 (32.43)

1.00

 

No

193 (62.26) 

117 (37.74)

1.16 (0.81-1.67)

0.408

CI = Confidence Interval, cPR = Crude Prevalence Ratio, P Value is Significant at 0.05 level


 

Fear of pain from dental procedures and perception that dental visits are important were the only variables found to be significantly associated with utilization of oral health services. Study participants who had no fear of pain from dental procedures were more likely to utilize oral health services than those who feared pain from dental procedures. Study participants who perceived that oral health visits are important were 66% more likely to utilize oral health services compared to their counterparts who perceived that oral health visits were not important (Table 5).


 

 

Table 6: Health Services Related Factors Associated With Utilization of Oral Health Services

Variables

Utilization 

cPR (95% CI)

P Value

No

Count (%)

Yes

Count (%)

Oral health Services are expensive 

Yes

98 (66.67)

49 (33.33)

1.00

 

No

145 (61.18)

92 (38.82)

1.16 (0.88-1.54)

0.285

Previous experience of poor oral health service

Yes

80 (64.00)

45 (36.00)

1.00

 

No

163 (62.93)

96 (37.07)

1.03 (0.78-1.37)

0.840

Previous experience of poor oral health service was from a dental clinic 

Yes

164 (70.69)

68 (29.31)

1.00

 

No

79 (51.97)

73 (48.03)

0.77 (0.48-1.24)

0.287

Availability of a dentist nearby 

Yes

163 (63.42)

94 (36.58)

1.00

 

No

80 (62.99)

47 (37.01)

1.01 (0.77-1.34)

0.934

Would seek dental treatment if dental clinic was close in the area

Yes 

34 (44.16)

43 (55.84)

1.00

 

No

30 (56.60)

23 (43.40)

0.77 (0.54-1.12)

0.178

Maybe

15 (68.18)

07 (31.82)

0.57 (0.30-1.09)

0.088

Oral health services offered in government facilities 

No

180 (66.42)

91 (33.58)

1.00

 

Yes

63 (55.75)

50 (44.25)

1.32 (1.01-1.72)

0.043

Perception of health worker’s attitude 

Negative

78 (73.58)

28 (26.42)

1.00

 

Positive

119 (55.87)

94 (44.13)

1.67 (1.17-2.38)

0.004

Don’t Know

46 (70.77)

19 (29.23)

1.11 (0.67-1.81)

0.688

Received instruction on care of the teeth

Yes

108 (65.06)

58 (34.94)

1.00

 

No

135 (61.93)

83 (38.07)

1.09 (0.83-1.43)

0.530

Long Waiting time  

Yes

103 (62.42)

62 (37.58)

1.00

 

No

140 (63.93)

79 (36.07)

0.96 (0.74-1.25)

0.762

CI = Confidence Interval, cPR = Crude Prevalence Ratio, P Value is Significant at 0.05 level

 


 

Regarding Dental/Oral Health related factors, availability of oral health services in government health facilities and health workers attitude were found to be significantly statistically associated with utilization of oral health services ( P=0.043). Also participants who said that health workers had positive attitude towards clients were also more likely to utilize these services ( P=0.004). 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 7: Multivariate Analysis to Show Factors Independently Associated With Utilization of Oral Health Services

Variables

Utilization 

aPR (95% CI)

P Value

No

Count, (%)

Yes

Count, (%)

Religion

 

 

 

 

Catholic

91 (63.64)

52 (36.36)

1.00

 

Anglican

88 (61.54)

55 (38.46)

1.04 (0.79-1.38)

0.770

Muslim

46 (68.66)

21 (31.34)

0.92 (0.63-1.33)

0.649

SDA

08 (44.44)

10 (55.56)

1.50 (0.93-2.41)

0.096

Others

10 (76.92)

03 (23.08)

0.73 (0.33-1.62)

0.434

Marital Status

 

 

 

 

Not Married

35 (60.34)

23 (39.66)

1.00

 

Married

159 (61.63)

99 (38.37)

0.97 (0.68-1.38)

0.855

Cohabiting

16 (72.73)

06 (27.27)

0.69 (0.32-1.46)

0.330

Divorced

33 (71.74)

13 (28.26)

0.71 (0.41-1.25)

0.236

Education Level 

 

 

 

None

88 (74.58)

30 (25.42)

1.00

 

Primary

33 (67.35)

16 (32.65)

1.15 (0.70-1.89)

0.575

Secondary

69 (75.82)

22 (24.18)

0.89 (0.56-1.42)

0.628

Tertiary 

53 (42.06)

73 (57.94)

2.03 (1.45-2.82)

<0.001

Average Monthly Income 

 

 

 

 

<501,000

153 (73.91)

54 (26.09)

1.00

 

501,000-1,000,000

45 (61.64)

28 (38.36)

1.26 (0.88-1.81)

0.198

>1,000,0000 

45 (43.27)

59 (56.73)

1.94 (1.48-2.56)

<0.001

Fear of pain from dental procedures

Yes  

90 (70.87)

37 (29.13)

1.00

 

No  

153 (59.53)

104 (40.47)

1.36 (1.02-1.82)

0.035

Oral health Visits are important  

Yes

171 (59.79)

115 (40.21)

1.00

 

No

72 (73.47)

26 (26.53)

0.68 (0.50-0.93)

0.017

Oral health services offered in government facilities 

No

180 (66.42)

91 (33.58)

1.00

 

Yes

63 (55.75)

50 (44.25)

1.18 (0.91-1.54)

0.220

Perception of health worker’s attitude 

Negative

78 (73.58)

28 (26.42)

1.00

 

Positive

119 (55.87)

94 (44.13)

1.46 (1.04-2.05)

0.028

Don’t Know

46 (70.77)

19 (29.23)

1.02 (0.64-1.61)

0.942

Long Distance to Health Facility  

Yes

137 (64.32)

76 (35.68)

1.00

 

No

106 (61.99)

65 (38.01) 

1.22 (0.95-1.56)

0.113

CI = Confidence Interval, aPR = Adjusted Prevalence Ratio, P Value is Significant at 0.05 level

 


 

Education level, Average monthly income, fear of pain from dental procedures, perception that oral health visits are important and health worker’s attitude remained independently associated with utilization of oral health services among study participants (Table 7). 


 

 


 

DISCUSSION

This study showed poor utilization oral health services amongst the studied population.  This finding is in keeping with the results of a previous study done in Nellore District of India which showed that only 36% of patients had visited the dentist in the last 12 months 21This finding also concurs with the findings of Varenne et al 6 who suggested that service utilization for preventive and promotive care is generally poor in developing countries 6.  This is however in contrast with those of studies done in Germany which revealed the utilization of any dental service was 73% 22 and the United States of America where 70% of all adults reported having one or more dentist visits in the past year 23. The disparities in the study findings could have arisen due to the fact that the previous studies were conducted in developed countries unlike the present study which was conducted in suburban setting in a developing county.

With regards to socio demographic factors and their relationship to the level of utilization of oral health services, some factors showed a statistically significant relationship with utilization of oral health services and thus include level of education and average monthly income.

The level of education and oral/dental health utilization is in agreement with the results of a Turkish study which showed that individuals with higher levels of education use dental services more than others 24. Similarly, Motlagh et al. 2 found that higher education level of the head of the household had positive relationships with the increased utilization of dental services. This is probably because being educated makes an individual more likely enlightened about oral health conditions and hence the need to pay attention to oral health. 

This finding implies that the higher the level of education, the higher the probability of utilizing oral healthcare facilities for a dental visit. Education can lead people to be more health-conscious, and helps them make better and healthier lifestyle choices. Conversely, lower knowledge of oral health can be associated with unhealthy behaviors and less interest in preventive treatment. In a study done in Shimla, India, for example, the group with higher education showed higher dental visits than the group with lower education indicating that education may be correlated with high health consciousness, which in turn stimulates preventive behavior such as regular visits for a check‑up 25.

Also, it was observed that an average monthly income of more than one million Ugandan shillings (about $300) was associated with increased likelihood of utilizing oral health services. The expensive nature of dental treatment has consistently remained a barrier for utilization of oral health services and statistics throughout the world. It has been suggested in previous studies that people’s ability to access regular dental care is directly related to their annual income 6, 26.  Other socio-demographic factors showed no significant statistical association with the utilization of oral health care services in this study. However, this does not rule out the possible impact of these factors.

Furthermore, in this study, the level of dental anxiety relating to expected pain from dental procedures and perception of the importance of oral health visits showed a strong statistical relationship with utilization of Dental health care services. It was observed that the absence of phobia associated with dental treatment had a positive correlation with utilization of oral health services. This finding is similar to that of a previous Nigerian study where dental anxiety and fear, whether derived from prevailing community beliefs or personal negative dental experiences, greatly influenced attitudes regarding accessing oral health services. This was despite advances in dental equipment, procedures and preventive measures 26. Different studies have reported fear as the main barrier to oral health services utilization. Studies done in India 25, 27 found that fear of dental procedures was one of the factors for not visiting dentists.

This study also found out that participants who perceived that oral health visits are important were more likely to utilize oral health services. The most commonly reported reason for not seeking dental care is the widely held perception that one needs to visit dentist only when there are symptoms such as pain and other emergencies. Many studies show that one key reason for this is the belief that oral diseases are not serious or life threatening]. Fotedar et al 25 and Aikins & Braimoh 12 reported in studies in India that 62.5% and 70% of the respondents respectively believed that there is no need to visit a dentist unless there is pain. 

Failing to perceive oral health visits as an important activity makes individuals to seek oral health interventions when their conditions have worsened. This is supported by the results of a study done by Christensen & Helderman 28 in Tanzania where 91% of subject visited dental clinic only when experienced pain mainly from toothache. There is also evidence from other studies by Ajayi et al, 26 and Kakatkar et al 27 who reported reasons for visiting Dentists in the past were related to having oral symptoms or pain. 

Meanwhile, other individual factors did not show a strong relationship with utilization of oral health care services in this study but previous studies showed some correlation of age, pregnancy in women and effect chronic disease on the utilization of oral health care services. A study done by Sun et al. 29  among pregnant women in Eastern China which showed that only 16.70% of the participants reported routine utilization of dental care during pregnancy. Furthermore, a study conducted by Gao et al.30   among preschool children revealed that utilization prevalence during the prior 12 months was 9.5% among 3-year-old children and 12.1% among 4-year-old children. These variations maybe due to the peculiarities of the different study populations. Whereas the present study was conducted in the general adult population, Sun et al. 29 limited his study to pregnant women meanwhile Gao et al. 30 sampled children. 

The attitude of health workers towards patients showed a significant statistical relationship with utilization of oral health services among Dental/ oral health related factors.  Similar to findings of this study, Kronfol 31 reported that health system barriers to utilization can be due to poor attitudes of service providers. Effectiveness of health systems depends on how the nation uses its resources like personnel, facilities, equipment and materials to produce outcome. Availability of human resource is important for decision making and organizing how other resources can be utilized to cater for the needs of their clients.

The result of this study is also  in agreement with the results of a study done in Kenya which revealed that high client satisfaction was associated with friendly and understanding service providers, and that a service delivery point‘s good reputation often encourages users to return, which promotes access, utilization and service continuity 32. Effective interpersonal communication between health care provider and client is one of the most important elements for improving utilization of oral health services, client satisfaction, compliance and health outcomes 33.

Availability of Oral health services in government health facilities also presented a direct proportion with the level of utilization of oral health services. This could be due to the subsidized or free services offered in Government Health facilities. The expensive nature of dental treatment has consistently remained a barrier for utilization of oral health services and statistics throughout the world show that people’s ability to access regular dental care is directly related to their annual income 6, 26

Other dental/ oral health related factors did not show a strong statistical correlation with level of utilization of oral health services. This could be attributed to by the variation in the geographical settings where the studies were conducted as well as the variation in sampling techniques used to recruit the study participants. 

CONCLUSION

This study has shown that the level of utilization of oral health services in the suburban adult population in Ishaka is poor. There is also a clear need for oral health promotion strategies to improve knowledge and attitudes amongst the population and similar populations.

It was also determined that tertiary level of education, an average monthly income of >1,000,0000 Shillings (about $300), not being afraid pain from dental procedures, a perception that oral health visits are important and positive attitude of health workers were the factors statistically significant associated with utilization of oral health services in the studied population.

 Recommendations 

 Limitations and Strengths of the Study

Results of this study should be interpreted in light of certain limitations. To begin with, the study was conducted in a small geographical area (Ishaka Municipality). However, the results of the study can be interpreted with confidence because the sample size was large, scientific sampling techniques were used to recruit the study participants as well as scientific methods were used to analyze the collected data controlling for confounding factors by running a multivariable analysis. 

Conflicts of Interest: None declared

REFERENCES

1. WHO. (2017). Oral Health. World Health Organisation. https://www.who.int/health-topics/oral-health/#tab=tab_1

2. Motlagh, S. N., Ghasempour, S., Bajoulvand, R., Hasanvand, S., Abbasi-Shakaram, S., & Imani-Nasab, M. H. Factors affecting demand and utilization of dental services: Evidence from a developing country. Shiraz E Medical Journal, 2019; 20(12). https://doi.org/10.5812/semj.89076

3. Hosseinpoor, A. R., Itani, L., & Petersen, P. E. Socio-economic inequality in oral healthcare coverage: results from the World Health Survey. Journal of Dental Research, 2020; 91(3):275-281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034511432341

4. Baelum, V., van Palenstein Helderman, W., Hugoson, A., Yee, R., & Fejerskov, O. A global perspective on changes in the burden of caries and periodontitis: implications for dentistry. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2017; 34(12):872-906. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01799.x

5. Listl, S., Galloway, J., Mossey, P. A., & Marcenes, W. Global economic impact of dental diseases. Journal of Dental Research, 2015; 94(10):1355-1361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515602879

6. Varenne, B., Petersen, P. E., Fournet, F., Msellati, P., Gary, J., Ouattara, S., Harang, M., & Salem, G. Illness-related behaviour and utilization of oral health services among adult city-dwellers in Burkina Faso: evidence from a household survey. BMC Health Services Research, 2016; 6(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-164

7. Bayat, F., Vehkalahti, M. M., Zafarmand, A. H., & Tala, H. Impact of insurance scheme on adults' dental check-ups in a developing oral health care system. European Journal of Dentistry, 2018; 2(3).

8. Bloom, B., Simile, C. M., Adams, P. F., & Cohen, R. A. Oral health status and access to oral health care for US adults aged 18-64: National Health Interview Survey, 2008. Vital and Health Statistics. Series 10, Data from the National Health Survey, 2012; 253:1-22.

9. Brown, T. T., Finlayson, T. L., Fulton, B. D., & Jahedi, S. The demand for dental care and financial barriers in accessing care among adults in California. Journal of the California Dental Association, 2019; 37(8):539-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424396.2009.12223004

10. Wall, T., Nasseh, K., & Vujicic, M. Financial barriers to dental care declining after a decade of steady increase. Health Policy Resources Center Research Brief. American Dental Association. 2013.

11. Adeniyi, A., & Oyapero, A. Predisposing, enabling and need factors influencing dental service utilization among a sample of adult Nigerians. Population Medicine, 2020; 2(December):1-9. https://doi.org/10.18332/popmed/128504

12. Aikins, E., & Braimoh, O. Utilization of dental services among civil servants in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Journal of Dental Research and Review, 2015; 2(2):62. https://doi.org/10.4103/2348-2915.161202

13. Lawal, F. B., Taiwo, J. O., & Oke, G. A. Oral health practices of adult inhabitants of a traditional community in Ibadan, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Medicine, 2013; 22(3):212-217.

14. Kutesa, A., Kasangaki, A., Nkamba, M., Muwazi, L., Okullo, I., & Rwenyonyi, C. M. Prevalence and factors associated with dental caries among children and adults in selected districts in Uganda. 2015; 15(4):1302-1307. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v15i4.33

15. Masiga, M. A. Determinants of the Utilization of Oral Healthcare Among Female Caregivers of Children With HIV / AIDS in Nairobi City. 2017; 94(6):56-87.

16. Okoye, L. O., & Ekwueme, O. C. Prevalence of dental caries in a Nigerian rural community: A preliminary local survey. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research, 2018; 1(2):187-196.

17. Kaimenyi, J. T. Oral health in Kenya. International Dental Journal, 2018; 54:378-382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2004.tb00015.x

18. MOH. (2017). National Oral Health Policy. In: Ministry of Health Uganda. Ministry Of Health Uganda.

19. Bagramian, R. A., Garcia-Godoy, F., & Volpe, A. R. The global increase in dental caries. A pending public health crisis. Am J Dent, 2009; 22(1):3-8.

20. Sheiham, A., Williams, D. M., Weyant, R. J., Glick, M., Naidoo, S., Eiselé, J.-L., & Selikowitz, H.-S. Billions with oral disease: a global health crisis-a call to action. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 2015; 146(12):861-864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2015.09.019

21. Nagarjuna, P., Reddy, Vc. S., Sudhir, K., Kumar, R. V. S. K., & Gomasani, S. Utilization of dental health-care services and its barriers among the patients visiting community health centers in Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh: A cross-sectional, questionnaire study. Journal of Indian Association of Public Health Dentistry, 2016; 14(4):451. https://doi.org/10.4103/2319-5932.195844

22. Schwendicke, F., Krasowski, A., Gomez Rossi, J., Paris, S., Kuhlmey, A., Meyer-Lückel, H., & Krois, J. Dental service utilization in the very old: an insurance database analysis from northeast Germany. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2021; 25(5):2765-2777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03591-z

23. Rural Health Research Center. Dentist Supply , Dental Care Utilization , and Oral Health Among Rural and Urban U . S . Residents. Rural Health Research and Policy Centers, June, 2015; 1-13.

24. Mumcu, G., Sur, H., Yildirim, C., Soylemez, D., Atli, H., & Hayran, O. Utilisation of dental services in Turkey: a cross-sectional survey. International Dental Journal, 2014; 54(2):90-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2004.tb00261.x

25. Fotedar, S., Sharma, K. R., Bhardwaj, V., & Sogi, G. M. Barriers to the utilization of dental services in Shimla, India. European Journal of General Dentistry, 2013; 2(2):139. https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-9626.112314

26. Ajayi DM, Arigbede AO. Barriers to oral health care utilization in Ibadan, South West Nigeria. Afr Health Sci. 2012 Dec; 12(4):507-13. PMID: 23515140; PMCID: PMC3598293. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v12i4.17

27. Kakatkar G, Bhat N, Nagarajappa R, Prasad V, Sharda A, Asawa K, Agrawal A. Barriers to the utilization of dental services in Udaipur, India. J Dent (Tehran). 2011 Spring; 8(2):81-9. Epub 2011 Jun 30. PMID: 21998813; PMCID: PMC3184738.

28. Christensen l, Helderman VP (1994). Reasons for patient's delay and effect of treatment and advice on the utilisation of dental care services by factory workers in a developing country. http://www.santetropicale.com/Resume/28202.pdf

29. Sun, W., Guo, J., Li, X., Zhao, Y., Chen, H., & Wu, G. The routine utilization of dental care during pregnancy in eastern China and the key underlying factors: A Hangzhou city study. PLoS ONE, 2014; 9(6):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098780

30. Gao, X., Ding, M., Xu, M., Wu, H., Zhang, C., Wang, X., Feng, X., Tai, B., Hu, D., Lin, H., Wang, B., Zheng, S., Liu, X., Rong, W., Wang, W., Wang, C., & Si, Y. Utilization of dental services and associated factors among preschool children in China. BMC Oral Health, 2020; 20(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0996-x

31. Kronfol, N.M. Access and barriers to health care delivery in Arab countries: a review. EMHJ - Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 2012; 18(‎12)‎:1239-1246, 2012 https://doi.org/10.26719/2012.18.12.1239

32. Wambua, J.M., Mbayaki, R., Munyao, P.M., Kabue, M.M., Mulindi, R., Change, P.M., Ikamati, R., Jahonga, R., Ambalu, R., Maranga, W. and Mudany, M, "Client satisfaction determinants in four Kenyan slums", International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 2015; 28(7):667-677. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-12-2014-0110

33. Negri B, Brown L.D, Hernández O, Rosenbaum J, Roter D. Improving Interpersonal Communication Between Health Care Providers and Clients. Quality Assurance Methodology Refinement Series. USAID, Quality Assurance Project 7200 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 600 Bethesda, 2012. MD 20814 USA 301/654-8338, FAX 301/941-8427 www.urc-chs.com