Available online on 15.06.2022 at ijmspr.com

International Journal of Medical Sciences and Pharma Research 

Open Access to Medical and Research

Copyright  © 2022 The  Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited

 

Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method for the Estimation of Clofarabine in Parenteral Formulation

Deepak Kumar Sehrawat1*, Neetesh Kumar Jain2, Apoorva Tiwari1, Prerna Chaturvedi3

Department of Quality Assurance, Faculty of Pharmacy, Oriental University Indore-India

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Oriental University Indore-India

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Oriental University Indore-India

Article Info:

_____________________________________________

Article History:

Received 22 April 2022   

Reviewed 26 May 2022

Accepted 11 June 2022

Published 15 June 2022 

_____________________________________________

Cite this article as: 

Sehrawat DK, Jain NK, Tiwari A, Chaturvedi P, Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method for the Estimation of Clofarabine in Parenteral FormulationInternational Journal of Medical Sciences & Pharma Research, 2022; 8(2):72-82

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/ijmspr.v8i2.42           ____________________________________________

*Address for Correspondence:  

Deepak Kumar Sehrawat, Department of Quality Assurance, Faculty of Pharmacy, Oriental University Indore-India

Abstract

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

A Simple, accurate and precise Stability Indicating RP-HPLC method was developed for estimation of Clofarabine in Parenteral Formulation. Inertial C18 (150mm×4.6mm) 5µ (particle size) was used as stationary phase. The mobile phase used was Buffer: Acetonitrile 90:10 v/v. The mobile phase was delivered at flow rate 1.0 ml/min. UV detection was set at 263nm. The retention time of Clofarabine was found to be 3.07 minutes. Linearity was observed over the concentration range of 5-25µg/ml for Clofarabine. Force degradation study was performing and maximum degradation of Standard and Test of Clofarabine was found to be 18.8% and 17.5% in Acidic condition. The LOD was found to be 0.071 µg/ml for Clofarabine. Whereas LOQ was found to be 0.21 µg/ml. Moreover, the % RSD for repeatability, inter and intraday precision was found to be less than 2%, which reveals that the method is precise.  However, the change in flow rate and mobile phase ratio also did not show any significant variance. Assay of the dosage form finalized the applicability of this method for estimation of Clofarabine in Parenteral Formulation.

Keywords: RP-HPLC method, Clofarabine, ICH, LOQ, Linearity.

 

Email: dksehrawat123@gmail.com


 

1. INTRODUCTION:

 Pharmaceutical products formulated with more than one drug, typically referred to as combination products. These combination products can present daunting challenges to the analytical chemist responsible for the development and validation of analytical methods. The development and validation of analytical methods [Spectrophotometric, High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) & High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC)] for drug products containing more than one active ingredient. The official test methods that result from these processes are used by quality control laboratories to ensure the identity, purity, potency, and performance of drug products.

The number of drugs introduced into the market is increasing every year. These drugs may be either new entities or partial structural modification of the existing ones. Very often there is a time lag from the date of introduction of a drug into the market to the date of its inclusion in pharmacopoeias. This happens because of the possible uncertainties in the continuous and wider usage of these drugs, reports of new toxicities (resulting in their withdrawal from the market), development of patient resistance and introduction of better drugs by competitors. Under these conditions, standards and analytical procedures for these drugs may not be available in the pharmacopoeias. It becomes necessary, therefore to develop newer analytical methods for such drugs.

2. DRUG PROFILE: 

 

Clofarabine is a second generation purine nucleoside analog with antineoplastic activity. Clofarabine is phosphorylated intracellularly to the cytotoxic active 5'-triphosphate metabolite, which inhibits the enzymatic activities of ribonucleotide reductase and DNA polymerase, resulting in inhibition of DNA repair and synthesis of DNA and RNA. This nucleoside analog also disrupts mitochondrial function and membrane integrity, resulting in the release of pre-apoptotic factors, including cytochrome C and apoptotic-inducing factors, which activate apoptosis.


 

3. MATERIALS AND METHODS:

3.1 Reagents and Materials used: 

Sr. No

Chemicals

Specifications 

Manufactures

1.

Clofarabine

Active Pharmaceutical

Sion pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd

2.

Water

HPLC grade

Merck India

3.

Menthol

HPLC grade

Merck India

4.

Acetonitrile

HPLC grade

Spectochem

5.

Glacial acetic acid

HPLC grade

Merck India

 

 


 

3.1.1 Selection of Chromatographic condition:

3.1.2 Selection of mobile phase:

(A)  Clofarabine standard preparation: 

(B)  Preparation of working standard solution:

(C)  Preparation of Sample standard stock solution of Clofarabine   

4. RESULT AND DISCUSSION

4.1 Identification of Drugs:

 4.1.1Melting Point Determination

Melting point of the APIs were determined by using melting point apparatus. The observed melting points of APIs were compared with the reported melting point.

Table 1: Melting point determination

Name of Drug

Reported Melting Point

Observed Melting Point

Clofarabine

216-256C

232-244C

 

4.1.2 Infrared Spectroscopy

IR spectrum of Clofarabine were taken by KBr pellet method on FTIR and characteristic peaks were compared with IR spectrum of Reference standard given in Indian Pharmacopoeia.


 

 

 

Figure 1 Reference IR Spectra of Clofarabine

 

Figure 2 IR Spectra Sample of Clofarabine

Table 2 Interpretation of IR Spectra of Clofarabine

Sr. No

Functional group

Wave number (cm-1)

Mode of vibration

1

OH

3465.14

Stretching

2

NH2

3111.71

Stretching

3

CH, CH2

<3000

Stretching

4

C=C

1628.48

Stretching

5

C=N

1580.44

Stretching

6

C-O

1062.14

Stretching

7

C-N

1244.10

Stretching

8

C-Cl

703.63

Stretching

 

4.1.3 Solubility Determination

The solubility of Clofarabinewere checked in various solvents like distilled water, methanol, and Dimethyl Sulphoxideetc. The results are shown in table 

Table 3 Solubility determination of Clofarabine

Sr No.

Drug

Reported 

Observed

1

Clofarabine

Water : Slightly soluble in water

Methanol : Sparingly soluble in Methanol

Dimethyl Sulphoxide : Soluble in Dimethyl Sulphoxide

Complies with Reported solubility

 

4.2 METHOD DEVELOPMENT

4.2.1 Selection of wavelength

Scan the standard solution and test solution on UV/Visible spectrophotometer, over the spectral range 200 to 400 nm. Use diluent as blank. The UV spectrum of the test solution should exhibit maxima at the same wavelength (±2 nm) as that of a standard solution.Clofarabine show reasonably good response at 263 nm.

A) Standard preparation 

 

Fig. 3 Uv Spectrum of Clofarabine Standard solution showing selection of wavelength detection

B) Assay preparation

 

Fig. 4 UV Spectrum of Clofarabine Assay preparation showing selection of wavelength detection

4.2.2 Selection of Mobile Phase

To optimize the RP-HPLC parameters, several mobile phase compositions were tried. A satisfactory separation and good peak symmetry for Clofarabine was obtained with a mobile phase Buffer (1 ml Glacial acetic acid in 100 ml of water) : Acetonitrile (85:15) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min

(A) Development trials: 

Sr. No.

Mobile Phase

Ratio

Retention Time (min)

Remarks

1

Water : Methanol

60 : 40

---- 

No peak was Observed 

2

Buffer : Acetonitrile

65 : 35

2.945 

Peak shape was not satisfactory and fronting observed. 

3

Buffer : Acetonitrile

70 : 30

0.847 

Peak shape was not satisfactory and Tailing observed. 

4

Buffer : Acetonitrile

85 : 15

4.663 

Peak shape was not satisfactory

5

Buffer : Acetonitrile

90 : 10

3.706 

Peak was sharp and symmetric

 

Trial: 1   

Table: 4 Trial in mobile phase Water: Methanol (60:40)%v/v

Trial

Mobile Phase 

Ratio (%v/v) 

Retention Time (min) 

Remarks

1

Water : Methanol 

60 : 40

---- 

No peak was Observed 

 

 

Fig. 5 Trial in mobile phase Water: Methanol (60:40)%v/v

Trial: 2     Table: 5 Trial in mobile phase Buffer: Acetonitrile (65:35)%v/v

Trial

Mobile Phase 

Ratio (%v/v) 

Retention Time (min) 

Remarks

Buffer : Acetonitrile 

65 : 35

2.945

Peak shape was not satisfactory and fronting observed. 

 

 

Fig. 6 Trial in mobile phase Buffer: Acetonitrile (65:35)%v/v

Trial 3           Table: 6 Trial in mobile phase Buffer: Acetonitrile (70:30)%v/v

Trial

Mobile Phase 

Ratio (%v/v) 

Retention Time (min) 

Remarks

Buffer:Acetonitrile

70 : 30

0.847

Peak shape was not satisfactory and Tailing observed. 

 

 

Fig. 7 Trial in mobile phase Buffer: Acetonitrile (70:30)%v/v

Trial:4         Table: 7 Trial in mobile phase Buffer: Acetonitrile (85:15)%v/v

Trial

Mobile Phase 

Ratio (%v/v) 

Retention Time (min) 

Remarks

Buffer:Acetonitrile

85 : 15

4.663

Peak shape was not satisfactory

 

 

Fig. 8 Trial in mobile phase Buffer: Acetonitrile (85:15)%v/v

Trial:5      Table: 8 Trial in mobile phase Buffer: Acetonitrile (90:10)%v/v

Trial

Mobile Phase 

Ratio (%v/v) 

Retention Time (min) 

Remarks

Buffer:Acetonitrile

90 : 10

3.706

Peak was sharp and symmetric

 

 

Fig. 9 Trial in mobile phase Buffer: Acetonitrile (90:10)%v/v

Observation:

After considering the varying combinations of various mobile phases, Buffer: Acetonitrile (90:10)%v/v was finalized as it was showing good peak shapes and a significant amount of resolution.

4.3 FORCE DEGRADATION:

4.3.1 Acid Degradation:                         

Fig. 10 Blank Chromatogram of Acidic Degradation

Fig. 11 Standard Chromatogram of Clofarabine(15 µg/ml) for Acid  Degradation

Fig. 12 Test Chromatogram ofClofarabine(15 µg/ml) for Acid Degradation

Table 9 Acid Degradation

Degradation peaks

Retention Time(min)

Area

Tailing Factor

Theoretical Plates

Resolution

1

1.305

212.933

1.074

4618

     2.687

2

1.480

214.958

1.708

4481

1.304

3

2.481

210.592

1.429

7096

6.424

4(CLO)

3.709

1698.681

1.489

3369

2.776

 

4.3.2 Basic Degradation:

 

[Fig. 13 Blank Chromatogram of Basic Degradation]

[Fig. 14 Standard Chromatogram of Clofarabine(15 µg/ml) for Basic Degradation]

[Fig. 15 Test Chromatogram of Clofarabine(15 µg/ml) for Basic Degradation]

Table 10: Basic Degradation

Degradation peaks

Retention Time(min)

Area

Tailing Factor

Theoretical Plates

Resolution

1

1.300

212.933

1.074

4618

     2.687

2

1.478

214.958

1.708

4481

1.304

3

1.732

210.592

1.429

7096

6.424

4

2.201

205.867

1.489

3369

2.776

5

2.481

268.354

1.489

3369

2.776

6

3.004

267.214

1.340

7313

5.432

7(CLO)

3.706

1856.484

1.516

4538

1.831

8

4.759

248.157

1.447

3385

2.857

4.3.3 Oxidative Degradation: 

 

[Fig. 16 Blank Chromatogram of Oxidative Degradation]

[Fig. 17 Standard Chromatogram of Clofarabine (15 µg/ml) for Oxidative Degradation]

Fig. 18 Test Chromatogram of Clofarabine (15 µg/ml) for Oxidative Degradation

Table 11: Oxidative Degradation

Degradation peaks

Retention Time(min)

Area

Tailing Factor

Theoretical Plates

Resolution

1

1.589

292.235

1.248

4381

3.687

2

2.142

254.355

1.921

2486

2.304

3

2.482

235.557

1.348

6745

5.424

4

2.769

237.839

1.483

3462

4.776

5

3.238

2372379

1.804

1585

1.776

6(CLO)

3.705

1996.539

1.354

7153

3.432

7

8.622

237.456

1.842

4218

2.831

 

4.3.4 Thermal Degradation:

[Fig. 19 Blank Chromatogram of Clofarabine for Heat Degradation]

[Fig. 20 StandardChromatogram of Clofarabine (15 µg/ml) for Heat Degradation]

[Fig. 21 Test solution Chromatogram of Clofarabine (15 µg/ml) for Heat Degradation]

Table 12: Thermal Degradation

Degradation peaks

Retention Time(min)

Area

Tailing Factor

Theoretical Plates

Resolution

1

1.234

235.645

1.348

3548

     2.345

2

2.178

234.845

1.522

9423

1.842

3(CLO)

3.709

2191.691

1.354

3567

3.458

 

4.3.5 Photolytic Degradation:

 

[Fig. 22 Blank Chromatogram of Clofarabine for Photolytic Degradation]

[Fig. 23 Standard solution Chromatogram of Clofarabine (15 µg/ml) for Photolytic Degradation]

[Fig. 24 Test solution Chromatogram of Clofarabine (15 µg/ml) for Photolytic Degradation]

Table 13: Photolytic Degradation

Degradation peaks

Retention Time(min)

Area

Tailing Factor

Theoretical Plates

Resolution

1

2.450

282.235

1.364

2145

     3.685

2

2.761

259.347

1.675

2467

2.545

3

3.200

248.348

1.654

2746

2.545

4(CLO)

3.702

1596.648

1.314

2987

3.456

5

4.011

231.347

1.875

2667

1.655

 

[Table 14 Data of Force degradation study of Standard Solution]

Condition 

Area

Tailing Factor

Theoretical Plates

%degradation

Acid degradation 

1698.6815 

1.41 

7334 

18.8%

Alkali degradation 

1856.4843 

1.21 

3339 

15.1%

Oxidative degradation 

2567.5398 

1.54 

6066 

17.1%

Heat degradation

1962.6915

1.74

4982

11.2%

Photolytic degradation

1896.6488

1.87

2667

15.4%

 

[Table 15 Data of Force degradation study of Test Solution]

Condition 

Area

Tailing Factor

Theoretical Plates

%degradation

Acid degradation 

2564.5625

1.34

2745

17.5%

Alkali degradation 

1854.4655

1.15

5855

15.04%

Oxidative degradation 

2547.7652

1.31

8771

16.21%

Heat degradation

2345.8782

1.51

3632

10.1%

Photolytic degradation

1356.3547

1.42

3656

16.6%

 


 

5. CONCULSION:

The method was used for estimation of Clofarabine in parenteral formulation. For the sample preparation Mobile phase was used as a solvent. 10 ml of parenteral solution , accurately weighed (equivalent to 10 mg) and transferred in to 10 ml volumetric flask, added about 5 ml of Mobile phase in to it, sonicated for 30 minutes with intermittent shaking, cooled to attain room temperature and added up to 100ml of  Mobile phase and mixed well. It was filtered through 0.45 µ syringe filter. Further 1.5 ml of the above filtrate was diluted to 10 ml with Mobile phase to get 15 µg/ml concentration of Clofarabine sample respectively.

REFERENCES:

1. Tripathi KD., Essentials of Medical Pharmacology; 6th Edn; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd, New Delhi,2008-09, pp 819

2. Malcolm R Alison, "Cancer" Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK

3. Buddhini Samarasinghe, "The Hallmarks of Cancer tissue Invasion and Metastasis" Oct 30 2013

4. "Clolar Mechanism of Action" Sep 2015 http://www.clolar.com/Hcp-mechanism-of-action

5. International Conference on Harmonization, Quality of Biotechnological Products: Stability Testing of Biotechnological/Biological Products, International Conference on Harmonisation, IFPMA, Geneva, 1995.

6. FDA, Guideline for Submitting Documentation for the Stability of Human Drugs and Biologics. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD, 1987.

7. Dong W M. Modern HPLC for Practicing Scientists; A Wiley- Interscience publication, USA, 2006, pp 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471973106

8. Kazakevich Y and LoBrutto R. HPLC for pharmaceutical Scientists;A John Wiley and sons, 2007, pp 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470087954.ch1

9. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ and Glajch LJ. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography; 2nd Edn; A Wiley- Inter science publication, NY, USA, 1997, pp 5-42.

10. Skoog D.A, West D.M and Holler D.F; Fundamentals of Analytical Chemistry; 8th Edn, Saunders College Publishing, 2004, pp 973-992.

11. Sharma B.K, Instrumental Methods of Chemical Analysis; 25th Edn; GOEL Publication House, Meerut, pp 286-385.

12. Michael E S., and Ira S K. Analytical Method Development and Validation; Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1997, pp 25-29.

13. John Lacey, Patrick Flanigan, "Genzyme Seeks U.S Approval for Clolar to treat adult AML" Cambridge, 2008.

14. Clofarabine "Drug profile" , Oct 2015, http://us.chemicalbook.com/ChemicalProductProperty_US_CB2277491.aspx

15. Clofarabine "Drug profile" , Oct 2015, http://www.chemicalland21.com/specialtychem/nd/CLOFARABINE.htm

16. Clofarabine "Drug profile" , Oct 2015, http://www.drugs.com/cdi/clofarabine.html

17. Clofarabine "Drug profile" , Oct 2015, http://www.scbt.com/datasheet-278864-clofarabine.html

18. Pokharana M, Vaishnav R, Goyal A, Shrivastava A, Stability testing guidelines of pharmaceutical products, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics 2018; 8(2):169-175

19. Wang Juan, Zhang Rong, ZHAO Yan-yan, Lu Lai-chun, "High- performance liquid chromatography Clofarabine Injection Content." Med Pap Pharm Pap 2009

20. Hsieh Y, Duncan CJ, Lee S, Liu M. Comparison of fast liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric methods for simultaneous determination of cladribine and clofarabine in mouse plasma. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2007 Jun 28; 44(2):492-7. Epub 2007 Feb 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2007.02.007

21. Tu X, Lu Y,,Zhong D, Zhang Y, Chen X, "A sensitive LC-MS/MS method for quantifying Clofarabine triphosphate concentrations in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells." J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2014; 202-207 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.01.021

22. Venkata N, Jalandhar D, Gnana G, Rajendar B, Manoj P, Dhananiay D, Venkata N "Development of supercritical fluid (carbon dioxide) based ultra performance convergence chromatographic stability indicating assay method for the determination of clofarabine in injection" Mylan Laboratories Ltd, 2013; 7008-7013 https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ay41561a