Available online on 15.06.2022 at ijmspr.com
International Journal of Medical Sciences and Pharma Research
Open Access to Medical and Research
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited
Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method for the Estimation of Clofarabine in Parenteral Formulation
Deepak Kumar Sehrawat1*, Neetesh Kumar Jain2, Apoorva Tiwari1, Prerna Chaturvedi3
1 Department of Quality Assurance, Faculty of Pharmacy, Oriental University Indore-India
2 Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Oriental University Indore-India
3 Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Oriental University Indore-India
|
Article Info: _____________________________________________ Article History: Received 22 April 2022 Reviewed 26 May 2022 Accepted 11 June 2022 Published 15 June 2022 _____________________________________________ Cite this article as: Sehrawat DK, Jain NK, Tiwari A, Chaturvedi P, Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method for the Estimation of Clofarabine in Parenteral Formulation, International Journal of Medical Sciences & Pharma Research, 2022; 8(2):72-82 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/ijmspr.v8i2.42 ____________________________________________ *Address for Correspondence: Deepak Kumar Sehrawat, Department of Quality Assurance, Faculty of Pharmacy, Oriental University Indore-India |
Abstract ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ A Simple, accurate and precise Stability Indicating RP-HPLC method was developed for estimation of Clofarabine in Parenteral Formulation. Inertial C18 (150mm×4.6mm) 5µ (particle size) was used as stationary phase. The mobile phase used was Buffer: Acetonitrile 90:10 v/v. The mobile phase was delivered at flow rate 1.0 ml/min. UV detection was set at 263nm. The retention time of Clofarabine was found to be 3.07 minutes. Linearity was observed over the concentration range of 5-25µg/ml for Clofarabine. Force degradation study was performing and maximum degradation of Standard and Test of Clofarabine was found to be 18.8% and 17.5% in Acidic condition. The LOD was found to be 0.071 µg/ml for Clofarabine. Whereas LOQ was found to be 0.21 µg/ml. Moreover, the % RSD for repeatability, inter and intraday precision was found to be less than 2%, which reveals that the method is precise. However, the change in flow rate and mobile phase ratio also did not show any significant variance. Assay of the dosage form finalized the applicability of this method for estimation of Clofarabine in Parenteral Formulation. Keywords: RP-HPLC method, Clofarabine, ICH, LOQ, Linearity.
|
Email: dksehrawat123@gmail.com
1. INTRODUCTION:
Pharmaceutical products formulated with more than one drug, typically referred to as combination products. These combination products can present daunting challenges to the analytical chemist responsible for the development and validation of analytical methods. The development and validation of analytical methods [Spectrophotometric, High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) & High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC)] for drug products containing more than one active ingredient. The official test methods that result from these processes are used by quality control laboratories to ensure the identity, purity, potency, and performance of drug products.
The number of drugs introduced into the market is increasing every year. These drugs may be either new entities or partial structural modification of the existing ones. Very often there is a time lag from the date of introduction of a drug into the market to the date of its inclusion in pharmacopoeias. This happens because of the possible uncertainties in the continuous and wider usage of these drugs, reports of new toxicities (resulting in their withdrawal from the market), development of patient resistance and introduction of better drugs by competitors. Under these conditions, standards and analytical procedures for these drugs may not be available in the pharmacopoeias. It becomes necessary, therefore to develop newer analytical methods for such drugs.
2. DRUG PROFILE:
3. MATERIALS AND METHODS:
3.1 Reagents and Materials used:
|
Sr. No |
Chemicals |
Specifications |
Manufactures |
|
1. |
Clofarabine |
Active Pharmaceutical |
Sion pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd |
|
2. |
Water |
HPLC grade |
Merck India |
|
3. |
Menthol |
HPLC grade |
Merck India |
|
4. |
Acetonitrile |
HPLC grade |
Spectochem |
|
5. |
Glacial acetic acid |
HPLC grade |
Merck India |
3.1.1 Selection of Chromatographic condition:
3.1.2 Selection of mobile phase:
(A) Clofarabine standard preparation:
(B) Preparation of working standard solution:
(C) Preparation of Sample standard stock solution of Clofarabine
4. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Identification of Drugs:
4.1.1Melting Point Determination
Melting point of the APIs were determined by using melting point apparatus. The observed melting points of APIs were compared with the reported melting point.
Table 1: Melting point determination
|
Name of Drug |
Reported Melting Point |
Observed Melting Point |
|
Clofarabine |
216-256◦C |
232-244◦C |
4.1.2 Infrared Spectroscopy
IR spectrum of Clofarabine were taken by KBr pellet method on FTIR and characteristic peaks were compared with IR spectrum of Reference standard given in Indian Pharmacopoeia.
Figure 1 Reference IR Spectra of Clofarabine
Figure 2 IR Spectra Sample of Clofarabine
Table 2 Interpretation of IR Spectra of Clofarabine
|
Sr. No |
Functional group |
Wave number (cm-1) |
Mode of vibration |
|
1 |
OH |
3465.14 |
Stretching |
|
2 |
NH2 |
3111.71 |
Stretching |
|
3 |
CH, CH2 |
<3000 |
Stretching |
|
4 |
C=C |
1628.48 |
Stretching |
|
5 |
C=N |
1580.44 |
Stretching |
|
6 |
C-O |
1062.14 |
Stretching |
|
7 |
C-N |
1244.10 |
Stretching |
|
8 |
C-Cl |
703.63 |
Stretching |
4.1.3 Solubility Determination
The solubility of Clofarabinewere checked in various solvents like distilled water, methanol, and Dimethyl Sulphoxideetc. The results are shown in table
Table 3 Solubility determination of Clofarabine
|
Sr No. |
Drug |
Reported |
Observed |
|
1 |
Clofarabine |
Water : Slightly soluble in water Methanol : Sparingly soluble in Methanol Dimethyl Sulphoxide : Soluble in Dimethyl Sulphoxide |
Complies with Reported solubility |
4.2 METHOD DEVELOPMENT
4.2.1 Selection of wavelength
Scan the standard solution and test solution on UV/Visible spectrophotometer, over the spectral range 200 to 400 nm. Use diluent as blank. The UV spectrum of the test solution should exhibit maxima at the same wavelength (±2 nm) as that of a standard solution.Clofarabine show reasonably good response at 263 nm.
A) Standard preparation
Fig. 3 Uv Spectrum of Clofarabine Standard solution showing selection of wavelength detection
B) Assay preparation
Fig. 4 UV Spectrum of Clofarabine Assay preparation showing selection of wavelength detection
4.2.2 Selection of Mobile Phase
To optimize the RP-HPLC parameters, several mobile phase compositions were tried. A satisfactory separation and good peak symmetry for Clofarabine was obtained with a mobile phase Buffer (1 ml Glacial acetic acid in 100 ml of water) : Acetonitrile (85:15) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min
(A) Development trials:
|
Sr. No. |
Mobile Phase |
Ratio |
Retention Time (min) |
Remarks |
|
1 |
Water : Methanol |
60 : 40 |
---- |
No peak was Observed |
|
2 |
Buffer : Acetonitrile |
65 : 35 |
2.945 |
Peak shape was not satisfactory and fronting observed. |
|
3 |
Buffer : Acetonitrile |
70 : 30 |
0.847 |
Peak shape was not satisfactory and Tailing observed. |
|
4 |
Buffer : Acetonitrile |
85 : 15 |
4.663 |
Peak shape was not satisfactory |
|
5 |
Buffer : Acetonitrile |
90 : 10 |
3.706 |
Peak was sharp and symmetric |
Trial: 1
Table: 4 Trial in mobile phase Water: Methanol (60:40)%v/v
|
Trial |
Mobile Phase |
Ratio (%v/v) |
Retention Time (min) |
Remarks |
|
1 |
Water : Methanol |
60 : 40 |
---- |
No peak was Observed |
Fig. 5 Trial in mobile phase Water: Methanol (60:40)%v/v
Trial: 2 Table: 5 Trial in mobile phase Buffer: Acetonitrile (65:35)%v/v
|
Trial |
Mobile Phase |
Ratio (%v/v) |
Retention Time (min) |
Remarks |
|
2 |
Buffer : Acetonitrile |
65 : 35 |
2.945 |
Peak shape was not satisfactory and fronting observed. |
Fig. 6 Trial in mobile phase Buffer: Acetonitrile (65:35)%v/v
Trial 3 Table: 6 Trial in mobile phase Buffer: Acetonitrile (70:30)%v/v
|
Trial |
Mobile Phase |
Ratio (%v/v) |
Retention Time (min) |
Remarks |
|
3 |
Buffer:Acetonitrile |
70 : 30 |
0.847 |
Peak shape was not satisfactory and Tailing observed. |
Fig. 7 Trial in mobile phase Buffer: Acetonitrile (70:30)%v/v
Trial:4 Table: 7 Trial in mobile phase Buffer: Acetonitrile (85:15)%v/v
|
Trial |
Mobile Phase |
Ratio (%v/v) |
Retention Time (min) |
Remarks |
|
4 |
Buffer:Acetonitrile |
85 : 15 |
4.663 |
Peak shape was not satisfactory |
Fig. 8 Trial in mobile phase Buffer: Acetonitrile (85:15)%v/v
Trial:5 Table: 8 Trial in mobile phase Buffer: Acetonitrile (90:10)%v/v
|
Trial |
Mobile Phase |
Ratio (%v/v) |
Retention Time (min) |
Remarks |
|
5 |
Buffer:Acetonitrile |
90 : 10 |
3.706 |
Peak was sharp and symmetric |
Fig. 9 Trial in mobile phase Buffer: Acetonitrile (90:10)%v/v
Observation:
After considering the varying combinations of various mobile phases, Buffer: Acetonitrile (90:10)%v/v was finalized as it was showing good peak shapes and a significant amount of resolution.
4.3 FORCE DEGRADATION:
4.3.1 Acid Degradation:
Fig. 10 Blank Chromatogram of Acidic Degradation
Fig. 11 Standard Chromatogram of Clofarabine(15 µg/ml) for Acid Degradation
Fig. 12 Test Chromatogram ofClofarabine(15 µg/ml) for Acid Degradation
Table 9 Acid Degradation
|
Degradation peaks |
Retention Time(min) |
Area |
Tailing Factor |
Theoretical Plates |
Resolution |
|
1 |
1.305 |
212.933 |
1.074 |
4618 |
2.687 |
|
2 |
1.480 |
214.958 |
1.708 |
4481 |
1.304 |
|
3 |
2.481 |
210.592 |
1.429 |
7096 |
6.424 |
|
4(CLO) |
3.709 |
1698.681 |
1.489 |
3369 |
2.776 |
4.3.2 Basic Degradation:
[Fig. 13 Blank Chromatogram of Basic Degradation]
[Fig. 14 Standard Chromatogram of Clofarabine(15 µg/ml) for Basic Degradation]
[Fig. 15 Test Chromatogram of Clofarabine(15 µg/ml) for Basic Degradation]
Table 10: Basic Degradation
|
Degradation peaks |
Retention Time(min) |
Area |
Tailing Factor |
Theoretical Plates |
Resolution |
|
1 |
1.300 |
212.933 |
1.074 |
4618 |
2.687 |
|
2 |
1.478 |
214.958 |
1.708 |
4481 |
1.304 |
|
3 |
1.732 |
210.592 |
1.429 |
7096 |
6.424 |
|
4 |
2.201 |
205.867 |
1.489 |
3369 |
2.776 |
|
5 |
2.481 |
268.354 |
1.489 |
3369 |
2.776 |
|
6 |
3.004 |
267.214 |
1.340 |
7313 |
5.432 |
|
7(CLO) |
3.706 |
1856.484 |
1.516 |
4538 |
1.831 |
|
8 |
4.759 |
248.157 |
1.447 |
3385 |
2.857 |
4.3.3 Oxidative Degradation:
[Fig. 16 Blank Chromatogram of Oxidative Degradation]
[Fig. 17 Standard Chromatogram of Clofarabine (15 µg/ml) for Oxidative Degradation]
Fig. 18 Test Chromatogram of Clofarabine (15 µg/ml) for Oxidative Degradation
Table 11: Oxidative Degradation
|
Degradation peaks |
Retention Time(min) |
Area |
Tailing Factor |
Theoretical Plates |
Resolution |
|
1 |
1.589 |
292.235 |
1.248 |
4381 |
3.687 |
|
2 |
2.142 |
254.355 |
1.921 |
2486 |
2.304 |
|
3 |
2.482 |
235.557 |
1.348 |
6745 |
5.424 |
|
4 |
2.769 |
237.839 |
1.483 |
3462 |
4.776 |
|
5 |
3.238 |
2372379 |
1.804 |
1585 |
1.776 |
|
6(CLO) |
3.705 |
1996.539 |
1.354 |
7153 |
3.432 |
|
7 |
8.622 |
237.456 |
1.842 |
4218 |
2.831 |
4.3.4 Thermal Degradation:
[Fig. 19 Blank Chromatogram of Clofarabine for Heat Degradation]
[Fig. 20 StandardChromatogram of Clofarabine (15 µg/ml) for Heat Degradation]
[Fig. 21 Test solution Chromatogram of Clofarabine (15 µg/ml) for Heat Degradation]
Table 12: Thermal Degradation
|
Degradation peaks |
Retention Time(min) |
Area |
Tailing Factor |
Theoretical Plates |
Resolution |
|
1 |
1.234 |
235.645 |
1.348 |
3548 |
2.345 |
|
2 |
2.178 |
234.845 |
1.522 |
9423 |
1.842 |
|
3(CLO) |
3.709 |
2191.691 |
1.354 |
3567 |
3.458 |
4.3.5 Photolytic Degradation:
[Fig. 22 Blank Chromatogram of Clofarabine for Photolytic Degradation]
[Fig. 23 Standard solution Chromatogram of Clofarabine (15 µg/ml) for Photolytic Degradation]
[Fig. 24 Test solution Chromatogram of Clofarabine (15 µg/ml) for Photolytic Degradation]
Table 13: Photolytic Degradation
|
Degradation peaks |
Retention Time(min) |
Area |
Tailing Factor |
Theoretical Plates |
Resolution |
|
1 |
2.450 |
282.235 |
1.364 |
2145 |
3.685 |
|
2 |
2.761 |
259.347 |
1.675 |
2467 |
2.545 |
|
3 |
3.200 |
248.348 |
1.654 |
2746 |
2.545 |
|
4(CLO) |
3.702 |
1596.648 |
1.314 |
2987 |
3.456 |
|
5 |
4.011 |
231.347 |
1.875 |
2667 |
1.655 |
[Table 14 Data of Force degradation study of Standard Solution]
|
Condition |
Area |
Tailing Factor |
Theoretical Plates |
%degradation |
|
Acid degradation |
1698.6815 |
1.41 |
7334 |
18.8% |
|
Alkali degradation |
1856.4843 |
1.21 |
3339 |
15.1% |
|
Oxidative degradation |
2567.5398 |
1.54 |
6066 |
17.1% |
|
Heat degradation |
1962.6915 |
1.74 |
4982 |
11.2% |
|
Photolytic degradation |
1896.6488 |
1.87 |
2667 |
15.4% |
[Table 15 Data of Force degradation study of Test Solution]
|
Condition |
Area |
Tailing Factor |
Theoretical Plates |
%degradation |
|
Acid degradation |
2564.5625 |
1.34 |
2745 |
17.5% |
|
Alkali degradation |
1854.4655 |
1.15 |
5855 |
15.04% |
|
Oxidative degradation |
2547.7652 |
1.31 |
8771 |
16.21% |
|
Heat degradation |
2345.8782 |
1.51 |
3632 |
10.1% |
|
Photolytic degradation |
1356.3547 |
1.42 |
3656 |
16.6% |
5. CONCULSION:
The method was used for estimation of Clofarabine in parenteral formulation. For the sample preparation Mobile phase was used as a solvent. 10 ml of parenteral solution , accurately weighed (equivalent to 10 mg) and transferred in to 10 ml volumetric flask, added about 5 ml of Mobile phase in to it, sonicated for 30 minutes with intermittent shaking, cooled to attain room temperature and added up to 100ml of Mobile phase and mixed well. It was filtered through 0.45 µ syringe filter. Further 1.5 ml of the above filtrate was diluted to 10 ml with Mobile phase to get 15 µg/ml concentration of Clofarabine sample respectively.
REFERENCES:
1. Tripathi KD., Essentials of Medical Pharmacology; 6th Edn; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd, New Delhi,2008-09, pp 819
2. Malcolm R Alison, "Cancer" Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK
3. Buddhini Samarasinghe, "The Hallmarks of Cancer tissue Invasion and Metastasis" Oct 30 2013
4. "Clolar Mechanism of Action" Sep 2015 http://www.clolar.com/Hcp-mechanism-of-action
5. International Conference on Harmonization, Quality of Biotechnological Products: Stability Testing of Biotechnological/Biological Products, International Conference on Harmonisation, IFPMA, Geneva, 1995.
6. FDA, Guideline for Submitting Documentation for the Stability of Human Drugs and Biologics. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD, 1987.
7. Dong W M. Modern HPLC for Practicing Scientists; A Wiley- Interscience publication, USA, 2006, pp 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471973106
8. Kazakevich Y and LoBrutto R. HPLC for pharmaceutical Scientists;A John Wiley and sons, 2007, pp 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470087954.ch1
9. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ and Glajch LJ. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography; 2nd Edn; A Wiley- Inter science publication, NY, USA, 1997, pp 5-42.
10. Skoog D.A, West D.M and Holler D.F; Fundamentals of Analytical Chemistry; 8th Edn, Saunders College Publishing, 2004, pp 973-992.
11. Sharma B.K, Instrumental Methods of Chemical Analysis; 25th Edn; GOEL Publication House, Meerut, pp 286-385.
12. Michael E S., and Ira S K. Analytical Method Development and Validation; Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1997, pp 25-29.
13. John Lacey, Patrick Flanigan, "Genzyme Seeks U.S Approval for Clolar to treat adult AML" Cambridge, 2008.
14. Clofarabine "Drug profile" , Oct 2015, http://us.chemicalbook.com/ChemicalProductProperty_US_CB2277491.aspx
15. Clofarabine "Drug profile" , Oct 2015, http://www.chemicalland21.com/specialtychem/nd/CLOFARABINE.htm
16. Clofarabine "Drug profile" , Oct 2015, http://www.drugs.com/cdi/clofarabine.html
17. Clofarabine "Drug profile" , Oct 2015, http://www.scbt.com/datasheet-278864-clofarabine.html
18. Pokharana M, Vaishnav R, Goyal A, Shrivastava A, Stability testing guidelines of pharmaceutical products, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics 2018; 8(2):169-175
19. Wang Juan, Zhang Rong, ZHAO Yan-yan, Lu Lai-chun, "High- performance liquid chromatography Clofarabine Injection Content." Med Pap Pharm Pap 2009
20. Hsieh Y, Duncan CJ, Lee S, Liu M. Comparison of fast liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric methods for simultaneous determination of cladribine and clofarabine in mouse plasma. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2007 Jun 28; 44(2):492-7. Epub 2007 Feb 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2007.02.007
21. Tu X, Lu Y,,Zhong D, Zhang Y, Chen X, "A sensitive LC-MS/MS method for quantifying Clofarabine triphosphate concentrations in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells." J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2014; 202-207 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.01.021
22. Venkata N, Jalandhar D, Gnana G, Rajendar B, Manoj P, Dhananiay D, Venkata N "Development of supercritical fluid (carbon dioxide) based ultra performance convergence chromatographic stability indicating assay method for the determination of clofarabine in injection" Mylan Laboratories Ltd, 2013; 7008-7013 https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ay41561a