Available online on 30.08.2026 at ijmspr.com
International Journal of Medical Sciences and Pharma Research
Open Access to Medical Science and Pharma Research
Copyright © 2026 The Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited
| |
Implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Resource-Limited Environments: A Critical Review for Nigerian Surgical Patients
* Fagbohun Omolola 1, Oshunpidan Adekunbi 2, Eke Ngozi 3
1 Department of Anaesthesia, Lagos State University College of Medicine and Teaching Hospital, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria
2 Department of Anaesthesia, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria
3 Department of Surgery, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria
|
Article Info: _________________________________________________ Article History: Received 18 May 2026 Reviewed 29 June 2026 Accepted 21 July 2026 Published 30 August 2026 _________________________________________________ Cite this article as: Omolola F, Adekunbi O, Ngozi E, Implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Resource-Limited Environments: A Critical Review for Nigerian Surgical Patients, International Journal of Medical Sciences & Pharma Research, 2026; 12(3):1-4 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/ijmspr.v12i3.198 _________________________________________________ *Address for Correspondence: Dr. Fagbohun Omolola, Department of Anaesthesia, Lagos State University College of Medicine and Teaching Hospital Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria |
Abstract ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been shown to improve perioperative outcomes and reduce healthcare costs in various settings. However, their implementation in resource-limited environments, such as Nigeria, remains constrained due to infrastructural, economic, and sociocultural barriers. Methods: This critical review synthesizes current literature on the application of ERAS protocols in resource-constrained environments, with a focus on Nigeria. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and African Journals Online was conducted to identify relevant studies. Data were extracted regarding the clinical benefits, cost-effectiveness, challenges, and context-specific strategies for ERAS implementation. Results: Evidence indicates that ERAS protocols can significantly reduce postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and overall healthcare expenditure in resource-limited settings. Successful implementation requires adaptation of ERAS components to local realities, prioritization of low-cost and high-impact interventions, and active engagement of multidisciplinary stakeholders. Conclusion: The adoption of ERAS protocols in Nigeria requires careful adaptation to address local challenges and cultural factors. By focusing on readily available, reproducible, cost-effective strategies and fostering collaboration among healthcare providers, ERAS protocols can enhance surgical outcomes and optimize resource utilization in low- and middle-income countries. Keywords: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS), perioperative care, resource-limited settings, Nigeria, surgical outcomes, healthcare optimization |
Introduction
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have revolutionized perioperative care, demonstrating improved patient outcomes, reduced complications, and shorter hospital stays 1, 2. ERAS protocols involve a multidisciplinary approach to patient care, incorporating evidence-based practices to minimize surgical stress, maintain physiological stability, expedite functional recovery and ultimately optimize patient outcomes 3. However, implementing ERAS protocols in low – middle income countries with limited resource poses unique challenges, 4, 5. This discussion critically examines the feasibility, benefits, and challenges of implementing ERAS protocols for all surgical patients in Nigeria.
Components of ERAS
The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol consists of multiple components that work together to improve patient outcomes. These components include:
2. Preoperative optimization: Optimizing patients' medical conditions, such as anemia, diabetes, and nutrition, before surgery. Preoperative fasting: Reducing preoperative fasting periods and providing carbohydrate-rich drinks to minimize catabolism 2, 4, 8
4. Thromboprophylaxis: This could be pharmacological, (such as heparin, clexane, enoxaparin) or non-pharmacological like thrombo embolic deterrent stockings and Sequential Compression Devices like pneumatic compression devices 4, 8, 9
1. Anesthesia: Using evidence-based anesthesia technique to minimize side effects and promote rapid recovery2. use of short acting anesthetic agents with rapid recovery profile 2, 9
2. Surgical technique: Using minimally invasive surgical techniques to reduce tissue trauma 2, 11
3. Fluid management: Managing fluids to prevent dehydration while avoiding fluid overload and maintaining optimal blood flow 2, 4
4. Temperature management: Maintaining normothermia to prevent temperature-related complications2
1. Pain management: Using multimodal pain management strategies to minimize pain and reduce opioid use2
2. Early mobilization: Encouraging patients to move and mobilize early after surgery2 Some advanced centers have walkers and other physical therapy devices
3. Early oral hydration/ feeding: Encouraging patients to eat and drink early after surgery2. With some centers providing tube feeding formulas to patients.
4. Fluid management: Managing fluids to prevent dehydration and maintain optimal blood flow2
5. Monitoring and follow-up: Regularly monitoring patients' progress and adjusting the ERAS protocol as required2
Challenges to implementing ERAS in Resource-Limited Settings
Anaesthetists in resource-limited environments like Nigeria are likely to encounter significant challenges in implementing ERAS protocols due to several factors which includes:
1. Limited access to essential infrastructure, medications and equipment like advanced anaesthetic machines, ventilators7
2. Inadequate training and support for healthcare providers 8, 9.
3. Limited availability of multidisciplinary team members 2, 9
4. Difficulty in maintaining normothermia and managing fluids in patients 2,
These factors can hinder the delivery of high-quality perioperative care. In 2017, Ibeanusi and colleagues highlighted the need for improved infrastructure, training, and resources to support surgical care in Nigeria8
Strategies to enhance the implementation of ERAS protocols in Resource Constrained Setting
A systematic and planned approach can facilitate the successful implementation of ERAS protocols. These includes:
These 3 key strategies are further elaborated below offering practical guidance and examples to support implementation.
- Modified preoperative fasting: Instead of traditional fasting from midnight, patients could be allowed to drink clear fluids up to 2 hours before surgery, reducing dehydration and discomfort.
- Low-cost preoperative optimization: Implementing low-cost interventions like anemia correction, glycemic control, and smoking cessation programs to optimize patients' health before surgery ¹.
-Thromboprophylaxis: This could be pharmacological or non-pharmacological. The resource limited environments can use less expensive devices such as the thrombo embolic deterrent stockings to prevent venous thromboembolism compared with more expensive Sequential Compression Devices like pneumatic compression devices2, 9
- Using low-cost anesthesia techniques: Utilizing regional anesthesia or spinal anesthesia instead of general anesthesia to reduce side effects and costs.
- Maintaining normothermia: Using simple and low-cost methods like warm blankets or warm IV fluids to prevent hypothermia compared with the more expensive forced air warming systems, heated humidifiers, thermal suits, radiant warmers in more elite theaters.
-Fluid management: Fluid administration may be guided by clinical judgment rather than advanced hemodynamic monitoring.
-Monitoring: Availability of advanced monitoring equipment such as multi-parameter monitor for invasive and non-invasive monitoring may not be feasible but basic standard monitoring such as capnography, pulse oxymetre, temperature, non-invasive blood pressure and pulse rate should be ensured.3,5
- Early mobilization: Encouraging patients to mobilize early after surgery with the help of family members or caregivers, reducing the need for expensive physiotherapy services and devices.
- Multidisciplinary team involvement: Involving surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals in the development and implementation of a practical ERAS protocols tailored to individual health facility.
- Training and education: Providing regular training and education for healthcare professionals on ERAS principles, protocols and their benefits.
- Monitoring and evaluation: Regularly monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of ERAS protocols and making adjustments as needed ².
- Family involvement: In some cultures, family members play a significant role in patient care. ERAS protocols may need to accommodate family involvement in patient care and decision-making. This can improve patient satisfaction and outcomes.
-Dietary preferences: Cultural dietary preferences may impact postoperative nutrition plans. For example, certain cultures may avoid specific foods or have specific meal preferences.
- Pain expression: Cultural norms around pain expression can impact pain management. Some cultures may emphasize stoicism, while others may be more expressive.
-Culturally sensitive patient education: Providing patient education materials in multiple languages and formats can improve understanding and adherence to ERAS protocols.
- Culturally adapted pain management technique: Using culturally sensitive pain assessment tools and incorporating non-pharmacological interventions can improve pain management.
-Socioeconomic status: Patients from lower socioeconomic backgrounds may face barriers to accessing ERAS protocols, such as lack of transportation or inability to afford medical care and medications.
-Language barriers: Patients with limited proficiency in the dominant language may require additional support to understand ERAS protocols and participate in care.
-Social support: Patients with strong social support networks may have better outcomes due to emotional support and practical assistance.
By understanding and addressing these cultural and social factors, healthcare providers can tailor ERAS protocols to meet the unique needs of diverse patient populations 11, 12.
Adapting ERAS protocols to accommodate local needs and values can improve patient satisfaction and outcomes11. Bentrem et al.12 in their study on enhanced recovery after surgery demonstrated the importance of cultural sensitivity in ERAS protocol implementation.
By adopting these strategies, ERAS protocols can be effectively adapted to already existing traditional Nigerian perioperative Anesthetic and surgical care protocols and healthcare providers can ultimately implement ERAS protocols and further improve the chances of better surgical outcome in patients in resource-limited settings.2, 11, 12
Conclusion
Implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols in resource-limited environments, such as Nigeria, requires careful consideration of the local context, challenges, and socio-cultural factors. This critical review highlights the potential benefits of ERAS protocols in improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. By adapting ERAS protocols to the local context, prioritizing low-cost interventions, and collaborating with stakeholders, healthcare providers can improve the quality of care for Nigerian surgical patients. Ultimately, successful implementation of ERAS protocols in resource-limited environments can lead to better patient outcomes, reduced complications, and improved healthcare systems.
Recommendations
1. Individual Aneasthetic Teams in collaboration with relevant stakeholders in their respective facilities should develop context-specific ERAS protocols that take into account local resources and challenges.
2. The teams should prioritize low-cost, evidence-based interventions that can be adapted to resource-limited settings.
3. They should foster collaboration and partnerships among healthcare providers, policymakers, and stakeholders to support ERAS protocol implementation.
4. Adequate provision should be made for training and education of healthcare professionals on ERAS protocols and their benefits.
5. They should monitor, evaluate and audit the effectiveness of ERAS protocols in resource-limited environments and make adjustments as needed.
By following these recommendations, healthcare providers and policymakers can work together to improve the quality of surgical care for patients in resource-limited environment
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no potential conflict of interest concerning the contents, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Author Contributions: All authors have equal contributions in the preparation of the manuscript and compilation.
Source of Support: Nil
Funding: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: The data supporting this paper are available in the cited references.
Ethical approval: Not applicable.
References
1. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 2008; 248(2):189-98. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a PMid:18650627
2. Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for elective gastrointestinal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations. World J Surg. 2013; 37(2):259-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0 PMid:23052794
3. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. 2005; 24(3):466-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2005.02.002 PMid:15896435
4. Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH, Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway in elective abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Surg. 2015; 102(3):188-98.
5. Greer NL, Gunnar WP, Dahm P, Lee AE, MacDonald R, Shaukat A, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2018; 267(5):860-70.
6. Pędziwiatr M, Pisarska M, Kisielewski M, Małczak P, Major P, Wierdak M, et al. ERAS protocol in laparoscopic surgery for colonic versus rectal cancer: Are there differences in short-term outcomes? Med Oncol. 2016; 33(6):57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-016-0772-6 PMid:27154634 PMCid:PMC4859853
7. Ologunde R, Leff R, Sharma S, Harrison S, Davies J, Shinde S, et al. Anaesthesia and surgical care in Nigeria: A review of the current situation. Afr J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015; 15(1):34-40.
8. Ibeanusi SE, Nwankwo UA, Onyemaechi NO. Surgical care in a Nigerian teaching hospital: Challenges and prospects. Niger J Surg. 2017; 23(2):63-7.
9. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240(2):205-213.10. Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L, Alkire BC, Alonso N, Ameh EA, et al. Global surgery 2030: Evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet. 2015; 386(9993):569-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60160-X PMid:25924834
11. Kwok AC, Leff R, Seshadri R, Magee WP, Fitzgerald TN, Hodges AM, et al. Implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program in a resource-limited setting: A pilot study. World J Surg. 2018; 42(12):3801-8.
12. Bentrem DJ, Kushner DM, Stein S, McGree ME, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery in Ghana: A feasibility study. J Surg Res. 2018; 221:103-11